by admin | Dec 21, 2013 | 2013 Toronto Star Columns, Toronto Star Property Law Columns
Bob Aaron bob@aaron.ca Title insurance will help cover costs if alterations needed Encroachment issues are easier to work out before a property sale, and a land survey is needed for that True or false? A land survey is unnecessary if the house purchaser buys title...
by admin | Dec 7, 2013 | 2013 Toronto Star Columns, Toronto Star Property Law Columns
Bob Aaron bob@aaron.ca Third parties named on title could disqualify your tax break Many buyers of new homes and condominiums may be surprised to receive a demand from Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) to repay as much as $24,000 in HST new-home rebates that they received...
by admin | Nov 23, 2013 | 2013 Toronto Star Columns, Toronto Star Property Law Columns
Bob Aaron bob@aaron.ca Buyers should check their purchase agreements to see whether the liability limitation clause is included A recent court decision raises the thorny issue of whether it should be legal for builders to restrict the ability of new home and condo...
by admin | Nov 9, 2013 | 2013 Toronto Star Columns, Toronto Star Property Law Columns
Bob Aaron bob@aaron.ca Establishing a quasi-judicial Condo Office should be done with care A sea change is coming for the management and operation of the province’s 600,000 condominium units if recommendations in Stage 2 of the Condominium Act review, released last...
by admin | Oct 26, 2013 | 2013 Toronto Star Columns, Toronto Star Property Law Columns
Bob Aaron bob@aaron.ca Sensational slaying created headlines but, a century later, questions arise whether buyers should be warned In the real estate field, when the value of a house might be affected by a history of murder, suicide, ghosts, hauntings or other...
by admin | Sep 28, 2013 | 2013 Toronto Star Columns, Toronto Star Property Law Columns
Bob Aaron bob@aaron.ca Get the details of property you’re buying in all-important survey I think it’s time that a land survey be made a compulsory part of every real estate transaction. It baffles me why a clause to that effect is not a part of the standard form...