Real Estate Litigation Articles

Spectre of tainted houses raised

By Bob Aaron
Toronto Star contributing columnist.
Bob Aaron

Bob Aaron

October 22, 2000

Spectre of tainted houses raised


Next week is Halloween and wee ghosts and goblins everywhere will be pretending that their home, or their friend’s, is haunted. For most of us, it’s just fun and make-believe. But for others it can be a real nightmare.

As of last weekend, Toronto had a total of 50 murders for the year. Based on historical data, about 60 per cent of homicide offences occur in the residences of the victim or the suspect. This means that over the years, dozens if not hundreds of Toronto homes and condominiums have been the site of murders. Today, many Torontonians may unknowingly have purchased and be living in homes that have a connection to a grisly crime or tragic death.

Last Sunday’s Star told the story of a non-profit housing co-operative at 1 Summerhill Rd., overlooking the lake in the Mimico and Lake Shore Blvd. area. Three years ago, a 2-year-old wandered off from the building and drowned in the lake. A year later, a 3-year-old died of smoke inhalation in the building. Two suicides and a death by manslaughter have also plagued the building, and last Saturday a fire tore through the upper floors of the building.

Ryan Gibbs, a resident of the building, was quoted in Sunday’s Star as saying, “Sometimes it almost feels as if this area is haunted.”

Gibbs is concerned about the current occupants. But what about the future ones?

Should it be the obligation of a vendor or a real estate agent to disclose to a purchaser the fact that a home might be “psychologically impacted” by its past? Some home owners might have such concerns – even if they are based on non-physical, unscientific or even irrational perceptions – that a home could be tainted, reduced in value or even haunted.

The disclosure obligation has been the subject of deliberations in courts and legislatures in the United States within the last decade, but in Canada the subject merits hardly a passing thought.

Consider, for a moment, the family of George and Kathleen Lutz who purchased a house in a small town in New York state, in 1975. The previous year, Ronald DeFeo murdered his parents and four siblings in the house. For 28 days after they moved in, the Lutz family allegedly experienced psychic phenomena traditionally associated with a “haunted” house. Their story, the Amityville Horror, became a best-selling book and the inspiration for several films. No public record seems to exist on the fate of the real estate agent who sold them the house.

At least 20 American states and a number of local U.S. real estate boards have adopted rules requiring various degrees of disclosure when a house has a reputation as being psychologically impacted. The growth of such disclosure began following a 1983 California court decision.

Dorris Reed purchased a house from Robert King. Neither King nor his real estate agents told Reed that a woman and her four children were murdered there 10 years earlier. Quoting Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice (Act 2, scene 2), the judge said,  “Truth will come to light; murder cannot be hid long.”

Reed learned of the gruesome episode from a neighbour after she moved in. She discovered that no-one wanted to buy the house because of the stigma, and sued to set aside the sale. The California Court of Appeals ruled in Reed’s favour, declaring that there was a duty to disclose facts known or accessible only to the seller if the information has a significant and measurable effect on market value.

Shortly after Reed v. King, California became the first state to pass a law defining the disclosure responsibility of an owner and real estate agent when selling stigmatized property.

A similar case occurred in New York in 1989 when bond trader Jeffrey Stambovsky put a deposit on a $650,000 house overlooking the Hudson River in Nyack, New York. Unknown to him, the vendor had published stories in Reader’s Digest about the house’s ghost, a cheerful little fellow in a revolutionary war uniform. The house had been included in local walking tours as a “riverfronts Victorian with a ghost.”

The court said that the broker had no obligation to disclose, and Stambovsky “hadn’t a ghost of a chance” to prove fraud. But he got his deposit back because the house had a prominent reputation and the non-disclosure of its history struck at the very essence of the contract between buyer and seller because of the reduced value of the house.

In this country, purchasers are free to ask about whether a home has a tainted history, but vendors may not be under an obligation to disclose or may simply not know about tragic events on the site. Even if they know about the home’s history, they may not be willing to live up to the spirit of the law.

What can you do if you own or want to buy such a house? Earlier this year, at a friend’s wedding party I met another guest who turned out to be one of the real estate agents who sold the fabulous Gianni Versace mansion in Miami (at a reported $29 million US). I asked him how he was able to sell it after its owner was murdered in the house.

He told me that the place had been on the market for months and in desperation they called the owners of Earth Release.   Operated by Diana Burney, the company has an incredible track record of providing spiritual “clearings” of properties, people, homes and businesses. (See their web site at or call (734) 786-6588. )

These are not the fictionalized ghost busters, but two very serious women who identify specific “blockages” within properties and use their varied talents to clear them. Once the clearing of the Versace mansion was completed, the property sold in less than six weeks. It’s hard to argue with that kind of success.

Stigmatized properties haven’t yet made much of an impact on the local real estate scene. But there are many of them out there, and if you’re concerned, ask questions, consider a house cleansing service, or memorize the famous Cornish prayer:

From ghoulies and ghosties and long-leggety beasties

And things that go bump in the night,

Good Lord, deliver us.

At some point, He may be the only one who can help.

Bob Aaron is a leading Toronto real estate lawyer.
Please send your inquiries and questions to or call 416-364-9366.

Bob Aaron is a Toronto real estate lawyer. He can be reached by email at, phone 416-364-9366 or fax 416-364-3818.
Visit the Toronto Star column archives at for articles on this and other topics or his main webpage at

Bob Aaron is a Toronto real estate lawyer. He is Certified by the Law Society of Ontario as a Specialist in Real Estate Law.

He can be reached by email at, phone 416-364-9366. Visit his website